Is possible hermeneutics today?
21
Oct
Diffuse theories and semi-theories, the latter for the most part,
I call semi-theory not one that is incapable of hermeneutics not to fall in tautological error, one that is able to interpret a theory the closest to what the author wanted to say.
Semi-theory is simply the reading part of a theory making a cut by peripheral aspects and disregarding plants, for example, a reading of Hegel from only the Phenomenology of Spirit without the elements (or principles) of Philosophy of Law, as not form a whole, or ignoring an important part of their work in Science and Logic (1812-1816) and Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences (1817-1830).
Hermeneutics was referring in classic interpretation of the Bible, it may seem that this is why the philosophical hermeneutics, which began in Heidegger and based on Gadamer, has sought in Scheliermacher, biblical hermeneutics, which stated that: “The feeling of immortality and faith immortality founded on the “union of the immortality of the essence of God with human nature in the person of Christ.”
This would seem an opportunistic link between religion and philosophy, but not exactly, although the link exists, but the fact that for Scheleiermacher religion is man’s relationship with the Totality (the Whole), and the All also relate with metaphysics and morality, the interpretation of non-biblical texts can also be made in this relationship with the whole.
The Scheleiermacher purposes are universal, and that he can speak of a universal hermeneutics that was supposed above particular hermeneutical: the Bible, the law and social sciences; thus: “I assume that the misunderstanding is a usual result (Scheleiermacher, 2005, p. 22), aims to” understand the statement at the beginning as well as your actor, and then better than he “(Scheliermacher, 2005: . 23) and it “depends on the talent for language and a talent for the knowledge of individuals (Scheleiermacher, 2005, p. 11).
Better understand the author to explicating what is unconscious in the author’s creation process, which takes place both the objective position on the subjective in their speech or writing objectively learning the language as the author possessed, and subjectively learning about life and contextual conditions of the author’s life.
Scheleiermacher point out that there are two kinds of talents that are rarely found in one person: the grammatical accuracy and possibilities of expression, for example, the use of analogies and metaphors.
We can now ask whether it is possible for an interpreter to reconstruct the author’s creative process, he must first find out the process that led the author and with the creative process is a unit, and to discuss the interpretation identify the divination process and comparative leading the author of a given text.
Understand the divination process as one that “in us, so to speak, we become the other person and try to understand the individual element directly (Schileimacher, 2005, p. 92).
Scheleimacher, F. Hermeneutica e crítica. Vol 1. Brazil, Ijuí: Unijuí, 205.
