As a global governance
30
Jan
This is the cry of many thinkers, economists and political scientists, snapping two books already mentioned here, Homeland-Earth (Instituto Piaget, 2001) Edgar Morin and Anne B. Kern, who point out that while the world moves for a larger unit, also reacts diversity and seeks to subsistence crops, and this connection is the most difficult.
The other newly appointed book is the book organized by Sacha Goldman “Le monde n’s plus temps to perdre” (2012) and published last year in Brazil, wrote him Michel Rocard, Mireille Delmas-Marty, René Passet, Edgar Morin Michael W. Doyle, Stéphane Hessel, Bernard Miyet well as Sloterdijk calls in the title, stating the urgency of global governance.
The book of Morin and Anne Kern, points out two opposing aspects: “1) homogenization, degradation, loss of diversity; 2) meetings, new syntheses and new diversity “(p. 36), but there is understanding in this long-term multiculturalism means that you can harmonize up a” unity in diversity “.
Peter Sloterdijck reminding Hans Jonas and the ecological crisis, criticizes Kant’s categorical imperative and guides you to the future and the relationship policy with nature, but he remembers two recent phenomena: “a technical and other political, came profoundly transform the his power “(p. 64),” the first of immaterial nature, “we are coming out of the Neolithic”, and the second of a political nature, “started in the 1980s, is none other than the release of capital movements in the world which, allowing the concentration across national borders, leading to the formation of a planetary financial power superior to the States “(p. 66).
The new relationship with technology which is an output of the Neolithic says Sloterdijck, is an emancipation of the once spectator, the apathetic citizen controlled by the state.
