Arquivo para December, 2015
Impeachment impeachmenting
03
Dec
The impeachment impeachment is because those who advocated more out 
Collor, FHC and outside off anyone who disagrees with them, now say it’s a scam, somehow it is.
Because the man who opened the process was in talks to get off the lists of political gifts in winning denunciations of Wash Jet (Lava-jato operation said Cunha is compromissed) came to flirt with the opposition, but saw his tight situation on the ethics committee asking your cancellation without the votes PT would be 11-9 for its cancellation, with three votes of pro-government members 12-11 to save Cunha.
In fact, the famous “Judgment” among government and Cunha’s supporters failed to materialize, especially when beyond them are being investigated Renan Calheiros (PMDB- AL), Aníbal Gomes (PMDB-CE) and Jader Barbalho (PMDB-PA) .
The accepted order was presented by two renowned lawyers: Hélio Bicudo (founder of the PT) and Miguel Reale Junior, and are based on the law of fiscal responsibility, if last year were over 20 billion in the red this year surpassed 100 billion, We spend a lot and spend evil.
But two other jurists Dalmo Dallari and Ives Gandra Martins, with different opinions on the request, agree with the political component of the process, since they are representatives and senators that will shape on removal of the president, but the government leader in the Senate is arrested , Senate President is investigated and Cunha camera just is not convicted of maneuvers that can not last long.
What Brazil needs: the impeachment impeachmenting impeachmented, perhaps taking a half stuck hundred, the worst is that it can even have people of the Supreme Court and it is no joke, mud do Rio Doce (river dead by dams burst) arrived in Brasilia and many dams are to burst.
Fundamentalisms, worlds and science
01
Dec
The fact known to scientists, thinkers, philosophers and also some
theologians, that Western thought is experiencing a crisis is a fact, what would be its roots is another problem.
Much of the thinking, to our correct view is that the basis of this error is the foundation of the Western Enlightenment thought it was idealism, not how they think the fundamentalists and nostalgic (right and left as Bauman) who claim that it is a crisis of modernity, but it was born of the Enlightenment and idealism, so is there a base.
Umberto Eco wrote a nice article: “Ciência, erro e fundamentalismo” (Science, error and fundamentalism) in which states:
“The problem is that much of the criticism of the ideology of progress (or the so-called spirit of the Enlightenment), the spirit of science is often identified with certain idealistic philosophies of the century. XIX, according to which history is directed always for the best, or the triumphant realization of itself, spirit or other life force that is always in motion toward a good end. ”
All developmental vision, “critical” to the objects as “disturbing” the subject, is what Bruno Latour calls “hell´s dichotomies” because it is in the marrow of Western thought, in which the naive fundamentalist thought is the most radical.
Bruno Latour in his book never been modern unveils major gossip illogical, a-scientific and fundamentalists, created a concept called symmetrical anthropology, in which he analyzes it is not dialogues between “areas of knowledge”, but among world such as: “Amerindian and modern science” and other “hybrid” issues that actually speak of different worlds and not areas of knowledge.
This applies to the network because the anthropological knowledge networking, there is therefore a dilution of the idea of authorship, where the multiplicity.
