Arquivo para September 21st, 2016
Dialogues difficulties
21
Sep
The use of dialogy, we can find it in disparate authors as the Austrian
Jewish Martin Buber (1878-1965), the marxist M. Bakhtin (1895-1975) or the Brazilian educator Paulo Freire, but the practice of everyday life, in times of political tension, ideological and social, it shows an immense difficulty.
For cultural reasons and thought, this is not anything liquid, but a solid idealistic and fragmenting thought, our need for fragmenting is stronger than to integrate, for a very simple everyday reason, does not wish to hear contradictory.
This automatism agree or disagree, right or left (ideologically with a structured thinking there are very few people today of this type), and the reason is simple can not handle, even on a temporary basis, with the unknown, with different or with speech is not ours.
In fairness when the defense was not widely heard she has two features: the infringing embargoes and requests for clarification, the latter are simpler, it is when one person decides to include declare “their vote,” or we could say his conviction in Overall, it is when the dialogue did not have the required efficacy.
The infringing embargo, here we make an analogy putting the infringing dialogue is a tentative to show the flaws in the process and the need of legal defense was not fully satisfied, in the case of the dialogue, the Other was not sufficiently heard. (*infringing embargo, is a juridical resources after the final sentences)
In the Brazilian context, it seems necessary the use of infringing dialogue, because on both sides seems to be a tentative to say that this or that side is that would be cool, power would then try the infringing dialogue, lack strength and political will to this not only legitimacy also missing, but initiative.
